[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154ebe12-6e3c-4b16-9f55-e10a30f5c989@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:28:43 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp, toshiaki.makita1@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2 2/2] veth: more robust handing of race to avoid txq
getting stuck
On 10/27/25 9:05 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> (3) Finally, the NAPI completion check in veth_poll() is updated. If NAPI is
> about to complete (napi_complete_done), it now also checks if the peer TXQ
> is stopped. If the ring is empty but the peer TXQ is stopped, NAPI will
> reschedule itself. This prevents a new race where the producer stops the
> queue just as the consumer is finishing its poll, ensuring the wakeup is not
> missed.
[...]
> @@ -986,7 +979,8 @@ static int veth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> if (done < budget && napi_complete_done(napi, done)) {
> /* Write rx_notify_masked before reading ptr_ring */
> smp_store_mb(rq->rx_notify_masked, false);
> - if (unlikely(!__ptr_ring_empty(&rq->xdp_ring))) {
> + if (unlikely(!__ptr_ring_empty(&rq->xdp_ring) ||
> + (peer_txq && netif_tx_queue_stopped(peer_txq)))) {
> if (napi_schedule_prep(&rq->xdp_napi)) {
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->rx_notify_masked, true);
> __napi_schedule(&rq->xdp_napi);
Double checking I'm read the code correctly. The above is supposed to
trigger when something alike the following happens
[producer] [consumer]
veth_poll()
[ring empty]
veth_xmit
veth_forward_skb
[NETDEV_TX_BUSY]
napi_complete_done()
netif_tx_stop_queue
__veth_xdp_flush()
rq->rx_notify_masked == true
WRITE_ONCE(rq->rx_notify_masked,
false);
?
I think the above can't happen, the producer should need to fill the
whole ring in-between the ring check and napi_complete_done().
Am I misreading it?
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists