netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for XFRM documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251030084158.61455ddc@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:41:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation
 <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Herbert Xu
 <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for XFRM
 documentation

On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:12:35 +0100 Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:26:14PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > XFRM patches are supposed to be sent to maintainers under "NETWORKING
> > [IPSEC]" heading, but it doesn't cover XFRM docs yet. Add the entry.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index d652f4f27756ef..4f33daad40bed6 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -18041,6 +18041,7 @@ L:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >  S:	Maintained
> >  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git
> >  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git
> > +F:	Documentation/networking/xfrm/  
> 
> That means that I'm now responsible for this.
> But I'm OK with it if nobody has objections on it.

Definitely no objections :) 
Let me mark this series as "Awaiting Upstream".