netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for XFRM documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQMd886miv39BEPC@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:12:35 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux
 Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Networking
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet
	<corbet@....net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for XFRM
 documentation

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:26:14PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> XFRM patches are supposed to be sent to maintainers under "NETWORKING
> [IPSEC]" heading, but it doesn't cover XFRM docs yet. Add the entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d652f4f27756ef..4f33daad40bed6 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -18041,6 +18041,7 @@ L:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
>  S:	Maintained
>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git
>  T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git
> +F:	Documentation/networking/xfrm/

That means that I'm now responsible for this.
But I'm OK with it if nobody has objections on it.