[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQlNSkaJQLnd-RQM@fedora>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 00:48:10 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: net: add YNL test framework
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 04:05:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 05:12:43 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, how should we execute the script under `tools/net/ynl`? Use the cli.py
> > like:
> >
> > ./cli.py --spec ../../../Documentation/netlink/specs/xxx.yaml
> >
> > Or use the installed name `ynl`
> >
> > ynl --family xxx ...
>
> I think under tools/net we don't have the kernel selftest infra.
> This is not great because we lose the integration benefits,
> but it gives us the ability to.. do whatever want..
Yep.
>
> I think relative paths would be fine? I believe that if you run cli
> from its directory you can use --family and it will refer to the
> in-tree specs automagically ?
OK, let me try it.
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists