[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5565fd2-358a-4e76-a449-f6fd97e6dc09@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 21:26:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dharanitharan R <dharanitharan725@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
syzbot+b4d5d8faea6996fd55e3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: rtl8150: Initialize buffers to fix KMSAN
uninit-value in rtl8150_open
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 07:56:26PM +0000, Dharanitharan R wrote:
> KMSAN reported an uninitialized value use in rtl8150_open().
> Initialize rx_skb->data and intr_buff before submitting URBs to
> ensure memory is in a defined state.
> @@ -769,8 +766,7 @@ static int rtl8150_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> enable_net_traffic(dev);
> set_carrier(netdev);
> netif_start_queue(netdev);
> -
> - return res;
> + return 0;
> }
While i agree that res is guaranteed to by 0, this change has nothing
to do with fixing a KMSAN report. Please make it a separate patch in a
patch series. A patch should do one thing, and the commit message
should explain the "why?" of the change.
Please also take a read of:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
The Subject line should indicate which tree this is for.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists