netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 16/16] net: stmmac: visconti: use stmmac_get_phy_intf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQ74G_WqoAusC2wd@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 07:58:19 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
	Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.x90@...l.toshiba>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 16/16] net: stmmac: visconti: use
 stmmac_get_phy_intf_sel()

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 07:23:26PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On 07/11/2025 15:29, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > -	switch (plat_dat->phy_interface) {
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> > -		phy_intf_sel = ETHER_CONFIG_INTF_RGMII;
> > -		break;
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> > -		phy_intf_sel = ETHER_CONFIG_INTF_MII;
> > -		break;
> > -	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
> > -		phy_intf_sel = ETHER_CONFIG_INTF_RMII;
> > -		break;
> > -	default:
> > +	int phy_intf_sel;
> > +
> > +	phy_intf_sel = stmmac_get_phy_intf_sel(plat_dat->phy_interface);
> > +	if (phy_intf_sel != PHY_INTF_SEL_GMII_MII &&
> > +	    phy_intf_sel != PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII &&
> > +	    phy_intf_sel != PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII) {
> >  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported phy-mode (%d)\n", plat_dat->phy_interface);
> >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  	}
> 
> Probably not too big of a deal, but don't we now incorrectly accept the
> "gmii" mode ?

We will accept GMII mode, but (a) does that matter, and (b) shouldn't
the DT binding be checking the phy-mode (we have some bindings that do.)

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!