[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0944325d-158d-45a4-a1d4-d61e645b07ea@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:50:50 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)" <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"parav@...dia.com" <parav@...dia.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"kuniyu@...gle.com" <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dave.taht@...il.com" <dave.taht@...il.com>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"ast@...erby.net" <ast@...erby.net>,
"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"ij@...nel.org" <ij@...nel.org>, "ncardwell@...gle.com"
<ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"Koen De Schepper (Nokia)" <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"g.white@...lelabs.com" <g.white@...lelabs.com>,
"ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com" <ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>,
"mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com" <mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com>,
cheshire <cheshire@...le.com>, "rs.ietf@....at" <rs.ietf@....at>,
"Jason_Livingood@...cast.com" <Jason_Livingood@...cast.com>,
Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@...le.com>
Cc: "Olivier Tilmans (Nokia)" <olivier.tilmans@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 05/14] tcp: L4S ECT(1) identifier and
NEEDS_ACCECN for CC modules
On 11/11/25 12:02 PM, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
> This bit will be set by congestion control (TCP Prague, which will be submitted after AccECN patch series).
>
> It is intended to use ECT-1 rather than ECT-0, and we were thinking this flag can be irrespective to AccECN negotiation.
>
> Shall I put in the Prague patch series?
Yes, please!
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists