netdev - Re: [PATCH v20 07/22] cxl/sfc: Map cxl component regs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251112155236.00006e84@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:52:36 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, Ben Cheatham
	<benjamin.cheatham@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 07/22] cxl/sfc: Map cxl component regs

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:45:04 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:36:42 +0000
> alejandro.lucero-palau@....com wrote:
> 
> > From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> > 
> > Export cxl core functions for a Type2 driver being able to discover and
> > map the device component registers.
> > 
> > Use it in sfc driver cxl initialization.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
> 
> > ---  
> Side note that it would be really handy when we are down to this last
> version or so before merge to have a short change log in each patch
> (here under the ---)  Saves a bunch of reviewer time checking back on what
> we need to look out for when it might be trivial:
> such as the patch description change in this one
Oops. Replied to wrong patch.  This was meant to be on 08.