netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: optimize eth_type_trans() vs CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <176404140776.172437.10107001254735892374.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:30:07 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 kuniyu@...gle.com, willemb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: optimize eth_type_trans() vs
 CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 06:17:25 +0000 you wrote:
> Some platforms exhibit very high costs with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
> when a function needs to pass the address of a local variable to external
> functions.
> 
> eth_type_trans() (and its callers) is showing this anomaly on AMD EPYC 7B12
> platforms (and maybe others).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net: optimize eth_type_trans() vs CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ec1e48e97feb

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html