[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251127183008.5ee6757f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 18:30:08 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, quic@...ts.linux.dev,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Stefan Metzmacher
<metze@...ba.org>, Moritz Buhl <mbuhl@...nbsd.org>, Tyler Fanelli
<tfanelli@...hat.com>, Pengtao He <hepengtao@...omi.com>, Thomas Dreibholz
<dreibh@...ula.no>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Steve French
<smfrench@...il.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>, Paulo Alcantara
<pc@...guebit.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>, Hannes
Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, David
Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>, John
Ericson <mail@...nericson.me>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, "D .
Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
illiliti <illiliti@...tonmail.com>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, Daniel Stenberg
<daniel@...x.se>, Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/16] net: introduce QUIC infrastructure
and core subcomponents
On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:28:13 -0500 Xin Long wrote:
> The QUIC protocol, defined in RFC 9000, is a secure, multiplexed transport
> built on top of UDP. It enables low-latency connection establishment,
> stream-based communication with flow control, and supports connection
> migration across network paths, while ensuring confidentiality, integrity,
> and availability.
Please look thru the Claude review and address the legit complaints:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=8ac157b3-6222-4e89-ac52-28e4ca52d6c4
If the tool is confused but not in an dumb way - it may be worth adding
a relevant comment or info in the commit message. Otherwise a note under
--- would be appreciated to avoid maintainers having to re-check the
comments you already considered and disproved.
Thanks for adding the MAINTAINERS entry, two notes on that:
- the entries must be sorted, so you need to move it down under Q
instead of putting it next to SCTP
- you seem to have copy/pasted the uAPI path for SCTP to the entry
instead of QUIC ;)
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists