[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <429e4120-b973-4b26-9c50-2e03c104253a@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:42:04 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, memxor@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
haoluo@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/16] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage
in bpf_selem_unlink
On 12/18/25 9:56 AM, Amery Hung wrote:
> @@ -396,17 +369,39 @@ static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
>
> void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
bpf_selem_unlink() will not be used by bpf_local_storage_map_free() in
the later patch, so the "bool reuse_now" arg is no longer needed and
should be cleaned up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists