netdev - Re: [TEST] txtimestamp.sh pains after netdev foundation migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260112062934.6d1b60c5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:29:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] txtimestamp.sh pains after netdev foundation migration

On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 22:28:39 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Can fold in the record_timestamp_usr() change too.
> > 
> > I can send this, your alternative with Suggested-by, or let me know if
> > you prefer to send that.

Looks like we got 30 clean runs since I added the printing change 
to the local NIPA hacks. Let's start with that and see if it's good
enough? As trivial as the change is I have the feeling that is has
to be something trivial for us to fail 30% of the attempts.

Please go ahead and submit with my Suggested-by.