netdev - Re: [TEST] txtimestamp.sh pains after netdev foundation migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1ebfc524172ab@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:38:55 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] txtimestamp.sh pains after netdev foundation migration

Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 22:28:39 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > Can fold in the record_timestamp_usr() change too.
> > > 
> > > I can send this, your alternative with Suggested-by, or let me know if
> > > you prefer to send that.
> 
> Looks like we got 30 clean runs since I added the printing change 
> to the local NIPA hacks.

Wow nice.

> Let's start with that and see if it's good
> enough? As trivial as the change is I have the feeling that is has
> to be something trivial for us to fail 30% of the attempts.
> 
> Please go ahead and submit with my Suggested-by.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260112163355.3510150-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/T/#u