[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9fca0a2-227e-4081-b7f9-ea7c2189f6d2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 09:07:24 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia)" <chia-yu.chang@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: "parav@...dia.com" <parav@...dia.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"kuniyu@...gle.com" <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"dave.taht@...il.com" <dave.taht@...il.com>,
"jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"donald.hunter@...il.com" <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"ast@...erby.net" <ast@...erby.net>,
"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"ij@...nel.org" <ij@...nel.org>,
"Koen De Schepper (Nokia)" <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
"g.white@...lelabs.com" <g.white@...lelabs.com>,
"ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com" <ingemar.s.johansson@...csson.com>,
"mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com" <mirja.kuehlewind@...csson.com>,
cheshire <cheshire@...le.com>, "rs.ietf@....at" <rs.ietf@....at>,
"Jason_Livingood@...cast.com" <Jason_Livingood@...cast.com>,
Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@...le.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/13] AccECN protocol case handling series
On 1/8/26 5:01 PM, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 1:05 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/8/26 9:47 AM, Chia-Yu Chang (Nokia) wrote:
>>>> Regarding the packetdrill cases for AccECN, shall I can include in this patch series (v8) or is it suggested to submit them in a standalone series?
>>>
>>> IMHO can be in a separate series, mainly because this one is already
>>> quite big.
>>>
>>> /P
>>>
>>
>> If possible, please send a packetdrill series _before_ adding more code.
>>
>> I have been reluctant to review your changes, because there is no test.
>
> Hi Eric and Neal,
>
> A separated AccECN selftest patch series has been submitted.
> You can find the used packetdrill commit and github link in the cover letter.
I marked this revision as 'changes requested' because I think a resubmit
after pktdrill patches merge will help the review process.
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists