netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb4bf4fb-a1a5-4e4c-aa54-aef6b131ea2d@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:01:30 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: javen <javen_xu@...lsil.com.cn>, hkallweit1@...il.com,
 nic_swsd@...ltek.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] r8169: add dash/LTR/RTL9151AS support

On 1/12/26 3:45 AM, javen wrote:
> From: Javen Xu <javen_xu@...lsil.com.cn>
> 
> This series patch adds dash support for RTL8127AP, LTR support for
> RTL8168FP/RTL8168EP/RTL8168H/RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 and support for
> new chip RTL9151AS.
> 
> Javen Xu (3):
>   r8169: add DASH support for RTL8127AP
>   r8169: enable LTR support
>   r8169: add support for chip RTL9151AS
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.h      |   3 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Note that you should not have posted this revision with the previous one
still pending:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260109070415.1115-3-javen_xu@realsil.com.cn/

I process the patch in order and I applied the above before reaching here.

@Heiner: I'm sorry for the confusion; the patchwork backlog size called
for somewhat urgent action and I thought your doubt for the patches
posted there where solved. Please LMK if a revert is required.

@Javen: please wait for Heiner feedback about an eventual revert before
any further action.

Thanks,

Paolo