lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXXiOj=+jbZbmcth06-46LoU_XQd5-NuusaRdJn-80_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:10:12 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, victor@...atatu.com, 
	dcaratti@...hat.com, lariel@...dia.com, daniel@...earbox.net, 
	pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, fw@...len.de, phil@....cc, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, 
	zyc199902@...omail.cn, lrGerlinde@...lfence.com, jschung2@...ton.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] net/sched: Fix packet loops in mirred and netem

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 8:40 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>
>
> We introduce a 2-bit global skb->ttl counter.Patch #1 describes how we puti
> together those bits. Patches #2 and patch #5 use these bits.
> I added Fixes tags to patch #1 in case it is useful for backporting.
> Patch #3 and #4 revert William's earlier netem commits. Patch #6 introduces
> tdc test cases.

3 reasons why this patchset should be rejected:

1) It increases sk_buff size potentially by 1 byte with minimal config

2) Infinite loop is the symptom caused by enqueuing to the root qdisc,
fixing the infinite loop itself is fixing the symptom and covering up the
root cause deeper.

3) Using skb->ttl makes netem duplication behavior less predictable
for users. With a TTL-based approach, the duplication depth is limited
by a kernel-internal constant that is invisible to userspace. Users
configuring nested netem hierarchies cannot determine from tc
commands alone whether their packets will be duplicated at each
stage or silently pass through when TTL is exhausted.

NACKed-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

(I hope I am still better than your AI.)

Regards,
Cong

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ