[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGF5Uf7FiD_RQoFx9qLeOaCMH8QC0-n=ozg631g_5QVRHLZ27Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 21:01:25 +0900
From: Sai Aung Hlyan Htet <saiaunghlyanhtet2003@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next,v3] bpf: cpumap: report queue_index to xdp_rxq_info
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 8:39 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
> Yeah, this has been discussed as well :)
>
> See:
> https://netdevconf.info/0x19/sessions/talk/traits-rich-packet-metadata.html
>
> Which has since evolved a bit to these series:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260105-skb-meta-safeproof-netdevs-rx-only-v2-0-a21e679b5afa@cloudflare.com
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260110-skb-meta-fixup-skb_metadata_set-calls-v1-0-1047878ed1b0@cloudflare.com
>
> (Also, please don't top-post on the mailing lists)
>
> -Toke
>
Thanks for the pointers. It is really great to see this series. One
question: Would adding queue_index to the packet traits KV store be
a useful follow-up once the core infrastructure lands?
- Sai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists