[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zf6gz83v.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:33:56 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Sai Aung Hlyan Htet <saiaunghlyanhtet2003@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<hawk@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next,v3] bpf: cpumap: report queue_index to xdp_rxq_info
Sai Aung Hlyan Htet <saiaunghlyanhtet2003@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 8:39 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, this has been discussed as well :)
>>
>> See:
>> https://netdevconf.info/0x19/sessions/talk/traits-rich-packet-metadata.html
>>
>> Which has since evolved a bit to these series:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260105-skb-meta-safeproof-netdevs-rx-only-v2-0-a21e679b5afa@cloudflare.com
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260110-skb-meta-fixup-skb_metadata_set-calls-v1-0-1047878ed1b0@cloudflare.com
>>
>> (Also, please don't top-post on the mailing lists)
>>
>> -Toke
>>
>
> Thanks for the pointers. It is really great to see this series. One
> question: Would adding queue_index to the packet traits KV store be
> a useful follow-up once the core infrastructure lands?
Possibly? Depends on where things land, I suppose. I'd advise following
the discussion on the list until it does :)
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists