[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22969680.EfDdHjke4D@7940hx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:19:34 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@...ux.dev>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
jiang.biao@...ux.dev, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/11] bpf: change prototype of
bpf_session_{cookie,is_return}
On 2026/1/14 09:22 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> write:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 6:12 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add the function argument of "void *ctx" to bpf_session_cookie() and
> > bpf_session_is_return(), which is a preparation of the next patch.
> >
> > The two kfunc is seldom used now, so it will not introduce much effect
> > to change their function prototype.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++--
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 4 ++--
> > .../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 ++++++------
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c | 4 ++--
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 ++++++------
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 8 ++++----
> > 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
>
> LGTM, let's do it
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 5f621f0403f8..297dcafb2c55 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -3316,7 +3316,7 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_entry_ip(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
> >
> > __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> >
> > -__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void)
> > +__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx)
> > {
> > struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx;
> >
> > @@ -3324,7 +3324,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void)
> > return session_ctx->is_return;
> > }
> >
> > -__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void)
> > +__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void *ctx)
> > {
> > struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx;
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > index e0189254bb6e..dc495cb4c22e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ extern int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr,
> > struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr,
> > struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) __ksym;
> >
> > -extern bool bpf_session_is_return(void) __ksym __weak;
> > -extern __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void) __ksym __weak;
> > +extern bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx) __ksym __weak;
> > +extern __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void *ctx) __ksym __weak;
> >
>
> (and actually drop these, vmlinux.h will have them)
OK, I'll drop these in the next version.
>
> > struct dentry;
> > /* Description
>
> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists