[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0636c732-2e71-4633-8005-dfa85e1da445@hartkopp.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:55:33 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/4] can: raw: instantly reject disabled CAN frames
Hello Marc,
On 14.01.26 11:45, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> @@ -944,6 +945,10 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
> if (!dev)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> + /* no sending on a CAN device in read-only mode */
> + if (can_cap_enabled(dev, CAN_CAP_RO))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, size + sizeof(struct can_skb_priv),
> msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
> if (!skb)
At midnight the AI review from the netdev patchwork correctly identified
a problem with the above code:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=fb201338-eed0-488f-bb32-5240af254cf4
An excellent tool indeed!
This patch has to be changed to not leak a dev reference.
Can you please change it in your tree and send an updated PR?
Sorry for that extra effort :-/
Best regards,
Oliver
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
index d66036da6753..12293363413c 100644
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -944,12 +944,14 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct
msghdr *msg, size_t size)
dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ifindex);
if (!dev)
return -ENXIO;
/* no sending on a CAN device in read-only mode */
- if (can_cap_enabled(dev, CAN_CAP_RO))
- return -EACCES;
+ if (can_cap_enabled(dev, CAN_CAP_RO)) {
+ err = -EACCES;
+ goto put_dev;
+ }
skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, size + sizeof(struct can_skb_priv),
msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);
if (!skb)
goto put_dev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists