[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7f38dbf-3c5e-428d-a4c3-19f3a9ce18ee@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:39:24 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Sreedevi Joshi <sreedevi.joshi@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>,
Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: Fix flow rule delete
failure due to invalid validation
[Cc: +Ahmed Zaki]
Dear Sreedevi,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 13.01.26 um 19:01 schrieb Sreedevi Joshi:
> When deleting a flow rule using "ethtool -N <dev> delete <location>",
> idpf_sideband_action_ena() incorrectly validates fsp->ring_cookie even
> though ethtool doesn't populate this field for delete operations. The
> uninitialized ring_cookie may randomly match RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC or
> RX_CLS_FLOW_WAKE, causing validation to fail and preventing legitimate
> rule deletions. Remove the unnecessary sideband action enable check and
> ring_cookie validation during delete operations since action validation
> is not required when removing existing rules.
>
> Fixes: ada3e24b84a0 ("idpf: add flow steering support")
> Signed-off-by: Sreedevi Joshi <sreedevi.joshi@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
> index 2efa3c08aba5..49cefb973f4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
> @@ -307,9 +307,6 @@ static int idpf_del_flow_steer(struct net_device *netdev,
> vport_config = vport->adapter->vport_config[np->vport_idx];
> user_config = &vport_config->user_config;
>
> - if (!idpf_sideband_action_ena(vport, fsp))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> rule = kzalloc(struct_size(rule, rule_info, 1), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rule)
> return -ENOMEM;
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists