[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260119083341.148109c2@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:33:41 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: dsa: ks8995: Add shutdown callback
On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:38:50 +0200 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 03:30:05PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > The DSA framework requires that dsa_switch_shutdown() be
> > called when the driver is shut down.
> >
> > Fixes: a7fe8b266f65 ("net: dsa: ks8995: Add basic switch set-up")
>
> $ git tag --contains a7fe8b266f65
> v6.18
>
> We are in the RC stage for v6.19, so this is 'net' material, not
> 'net-next', the patch has already made it into a released kernel.
The AI code review points out that the DSA docs/you suggest mutual
exclusion with .remove. Do we also want this to be addressed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists