[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e645d5e7-2f5f-4f38-b8e5-056f0cba46ce@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:42:29 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V5 10/15] net/mlx5: Add a shared devlink instance
for PFs on same chip
On 20/01/2026 08:57, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> +
> +static const struct devlink_ops mlx5_shd_ops = {
> +};
> +
> +int mlx5_shd_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> +{
> + u8 *vpd_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
So you just ignore people's comments. What is the point of review then?
Please respond to review and do not send the same buggy or wrong code.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists