[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260122073643.4d36e299@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 07:36:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <horms@...nel.org>,
<michael.chan@...adcom.com>, <sdf@...ichev.me>, <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
<dtatulea@...dia.com>, <asml.silence@...il.com>, <dw@...idwei.uk>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] eth: bnxt: always set the queue mgmt ops
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:34:20 +0530 Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:
> > +
> > + dev->queue_mgmt_ops = &bnxt_queue_mgmt_ops_unsupp;
> > if (BNXT_SUPPORTS_QUEUE_API(bp))
> > dev->queue_mgmt_ops = &bnxt_queue_mgmt_ops;
> > - dev->request_ops_lock = true;
>
> Can we also mention that driver with queue_mgmt_ops set makes it as ops locked
> driver in Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst ?
Did you check if it's already documented there before asking me to do
it? I know people don't read docs much but asking someone to document
stuff that's already documented is a bit funny..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists