[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXOMiAhf-NdQTonz@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:58:16 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, conor+dt@...nel.org, poros@...hat.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
tariqt@...dia.com, robh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
mbloch@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us, Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com,
jonathan.lemon@...il.com, saravanak@...nel.org,
aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com, mschmidt@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, leon@...nel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev,
grzegorz.nitka@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
richardcochran@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,08/12] dpll: Enhance and consolidate reference
counting logic
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:18:02AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> On 1/21/26 1:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch.
> >
> > Dunno if there's a reason for having this fixed by a later patch,
> > if not let's fix. I'm sending the review mostly because of the
> > comments on patch 12.
> Will reorder these patches... Maybe it would be better to send patch 9
> separately to net as this is the fix for the bug we found during
> development of this series.
Hi Ivan,
If it is a but in net, then yes, that sounds like a good idea to me.
Please include a Fixes tag if you take that route.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists