netdev - Re: [net-next,v2,08/12] dpll: Enhance and consolidate reference counting logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6da98781-9cf2-4756-a6b1-89cc650c9bce@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:27:21 +0100
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, conor+dt@...nel.org, poros@...hat.com,
 anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
 robh@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, mbloch@...dia.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
 Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com,
 jonathan.lemon@...il.com, saravanak@...nel.org,
 aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 leon@...nel.org, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, grzegorz.nitka@...el.com,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,08/12] dpll: Enhance and consolidate reference
 counting logic

On 1/23/26 3:58 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:18:02AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> On 1/21/26 1:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> This is an AI-generated review of your patch.
>>>
>>> Dunno if there's a reason for having this fixed by a later patch,
>>> if not let's fix. I'm sending the review mostly because of the
>>> comments on patch 12.
>> Will reorder these patches... Maybe it would be better to send patch 9
>> separately to net as this is the fix for the bug we found during
>> development of this series.
> 
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> If it is a but in net, then yes, that sounds like a good idea to me.
> 
> Please include a Fixes tag if you take that route.
> 
Yes, it was submitted to net with Fixes and recently merged as

https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/f3ddbaaaaf4d

Ivan