[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e91dfc01-373d-4d3e-9dd4-9fb3be92f756@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 23:23:10 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Max Schulze <max.schulze@...ine.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: usb: remove unnecessary get_drvinfo
code and driver versions
> Sorry about that. The only change is that I had overlooked smsc[79]5xx
> in the original patch because they had a version definition but didn't
> use it in get_drvinfo.
It would of caused less confusion if you had just sent a follow up
patch for smsc[79]5xx on its own.
We prefer lots of small patches, they are easier to find time to
review. Combing patches is generally the wrong things to do.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists