lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADkSEUjwCmowmo_AwZ7TNS2gDt0CLz6buvfjjXz7BrLfuokM4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:11:06 -0800
From: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>, Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>, 
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, 
	Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, 
	Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>, 
	Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Max Schulze <max.schulze@...ine.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, 
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: usb: remove unnecessary get_drvinfo code
 and driver versions

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 5:22 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> There are three problems with this version:
> 1) you haven't taken my tag, why?
> 2) there is no changelog to understand what's going on;
> 3) the v2 was sent too quickly (usually should be 24h+ between the versions).

Sorry about that. The only change is that I had overlooked smsc[79]5xx
in the original patch because they had a version definition but didn't
use it in get_drvinfo. I will follow these procedures even for trivial
changes in the future.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ