[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d17a810-9e74-4ef1-8fa7-3267a8678b40@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 19:48:40 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Max Schulze <max.schulze@...ine.de>,
Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: usb: introduce usbnet_mii_ioctl helper
function
> static int smsc75xx_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> {
> - struct usbnet *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -
> if (!netif_running(netdev))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return generic_mii_ioctl(&dev->mii, if_mii(rq), cmd, NULL);
> + return usbnet_mii_ioctl(netdev, rq, cmd);
> }
You are doing the same as phy_do_ioctl(), but for the old mii
code. However, we also have phy_do_ioctl_running(). It might make
sense to add usbnet_mii_ioctl_running()?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists