[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <086e7ceb-a1c5-4ea0-baf0-0abbe4590031@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:08:09 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] team: avoid NETDEV_CHANGEMTU event when unregistering
slave
On 2026/01/26 11:35, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/25/26 7:35 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> syzbot is reporting
>> @@ -1330,7 +1330,13 @@ static int team_port_del(struct team *team, struct net_device *port_dev)
>> __team_port_change_port_removed(port);
>>
>> team_port_set_orig_dev_addr(port);
>> - dev_set_mtu(port_dev, port->orig.mtu);
>> + if (unregister) {
>> + netdev_lock_ops(port_dev);
>> + __netif_set_mtu(port_dev, port->orig.mtu);
>> + netdev_unlock_ops(port_dev);
>> + } else {
>> + dev_set_mtu(port_dev, port->orig.mtu);
>> + }
>> kfree_rcu(port, rcu);
>> netdev_info(dev, "Port device %s removed\n", portname);
>> netdev_compute_master_upper_features(team->dev, true);
>
> same logic as bonding, so a netdev based helper that both drivers can use?
>
Maybe, but that will be an another patch. No need to combine a local
bugfix patch and a multiple-users cross-modules helper patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists