[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260127105304.21279cc2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:53:04 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "illusion.wang"
<illusion.wang@...ula-matrix.com>
Cc: dimon.zhao@...ula-matrix.com, alvin.wang@...ula-matrix.com,
sam.chen@...ula-matrix.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com,
hawk@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com, open
list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/15] nbl driver for Nebulamatrix NICs
On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 18:06:49 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:
> As per Jakub's advice in his review of v1 [*],
> Please try to create a minimal driver in the order of ~5kLoC.
Perhaps other maintainers will disagree, but for ease of review
and to avoid the huge reposts perhaps we should consider merging
something like patches 1 and 3* first, as the initial series.
And then you can build up the driver from there in reasonable,
5kLoC-at-a-time series?
* patch 3 currently includes things which do not seem machine
generated / like register descriptors like structs added to
nbl_def_channel.h and nbl_include.h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists