lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADkSEUh3mOq0CJmMbKMt_qVj6552y7r0HsE=D3sW3YiH2gnErg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:20:50 -0800
From: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: usb: sr9700: clarify code using BIT and
 GENMASK macros

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 5:51 AM Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:
> My advice is to wait for all your outstanding sr9700 to settle.  And then
> collect up those that are left into a patchset, addressing review of them.
> And include, in that patchset, this patch, in it's full form.

Hi, Simon,
That makes sense to me. I've adjusted this patch to be part of a new
patch series I'm working on, and to adjust all bitmasks, even ones
that are removed later in the series.
Ethan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ