[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260131164920.7e92896f@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:49:20 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/iucv: clean up iucv kernel-doc warnings
On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:01:04 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 1/31/26 1:11 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:47:59 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> * @path: address of iucv path structure
> >> * @msg: address of iucv msg structure
> >> * @flags: how the reply is sent (IUCV_IPRMDATA, IUCV_IPPRTY, IUCV_IPBUFLST)
> >
> > In general -- Could we possibly delete the duplicated kdocs in
> > the header. As clearly shown by this patch it's double the work
> > and kernel-doc will be able to find the definition wherever it is.
> > Kernel coding guide recommends kdoc next to definition.
>
> Thanks. I'll check all of that.
You probably figured this out but reading back I realize that my
message wasn't very clear -- I meant that some of the functions
are both documented next to their fwd declaration in
include/net/iucv/iucv.h and the definition in net/iucv/iucv.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists