[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96dba124-fa70-4bfc-9740-232a85f1d36e@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 17:31:29 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/iucv: clean up iucv kernel-doc warnings
On 1/31/26 4:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:01:04 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 1/31/26 1:11 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:47:59 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> * @path: address of iucv path structure
>>>> * @msg: address of iucv msg structure
>>>> * @flags: how the reply is sent (IUCV_IPRMDATA, IUCV_IPPRTY, IUCV_IPBUFLST)
>>>
>>> In general -- Could we possibly delete the duplicated kdocs in
>>> the header. As clearly shown by this patch it's double the work
>>> and kernel-doc will be able to find the definition wherever it is.
>>> Kernel coding guide recommends kdoc next to definition.
>>
>> Thanks. I'll check all of that.
>
> You probably figured this out but reading back I realize that my
> message wasn't very clear -- I meant that some of the functions
> are both documented next to their fwd declaration in
> include/net/iucv/iucv.h and the definition in net/iucv/iucv.c
Yes, I got that.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists