[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19c16df6e07.5d6555571430461.7492468111934043630@linux.beauty>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2026 09:44:27 +0800
From: Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>
To: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@...nel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"David Ahern" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Simon Horman" <horms@...nel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Pawan Gupta" <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"Feng Tang" <feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@...nel.org>, "Li RongQing" <lirongqing@...du.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Askar Safin" <safinaskar@...il.com>,
"Frank van der Linden" <fvdl@...gle.com>,
"linux-doc" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] liveupdate: suppress TCP RST during post-kexec
restore window
Hi Jakub,
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:51:19 +0800 Li Chen wrote:
> > During a kexec-based live update, userspace may restore established TCP
> > connections after the new kernel has booted (e.g. via CRIU). Any packet
> > arriving for a not-yet-restored socket will hit the no-socket path and
> > trigger a TCP RST, causing the peer to immediately drop the connection.
>
> Can you not add a filter to simply drop those packets until workload is
> running again? It'd actually be less racy than this hac^w patch ...
>
Thanks for the suggestion.
When you say "add a filter", do you mean installing a temporary drop rule
(nftables/iptables/tc) in the network domain which does not get rebooted by
kexec (e.g. LB/ToR/host firewall), so packets never reach the new kernel
until the workload is restored and ready?
If you meant a filter inside the kexec'ed kernel, I'm worried it won't cover
the critical window: kexec resets the ruleset, so we'd have to install the
drop rule extremely early (initramfs) before any packets hit the no-socket
path, which still seems inherently racy.
If the expectation is to drain/blackhole traffic externally and re-enable it
once the workload is running again, I can rework the series to keep only the
restore-window tracking plus a clear "restore done" control plane, and rely
on the external filter for the data plane.
Regards
Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists