lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYIPRqJMTRbvkF3s@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:07:50 +0100
From: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@...hat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	jkarrenpalo@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
	allison.henderson@...cle.com, petrm@...dia.com, antonio@...nvpn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] selftests: hsr: Add ping test for PRP

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:47:12PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-02-03 13:23:50 [+0100], Felix Maurer wrote:
> > But like you, I'm uncertain what would be the right thing to do and
> > which port should control the MAC for all the others.
>
> At the very least I need the same MAC on both ends for PTP.
> Now that check the spec, 5.2.1.1 "HSR handling of multicast frames",
> bottom below Figure 10, says it sends the frame over frame A and frame B
> oder the ports. The "src-MAC + sequence number" uniquely identify the
> same frame.
> Now I am certain that the two different MACs are wrong. Let deal with
> this later and then decide what to do about the testsuite.

Alright, I lean towards same MAC on both ports as well. But yeah, let's
fix this in the future, including the test suite.

Thanks,
   Felix


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ