[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260205091958.231413-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 01:19:55 -0800
From: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: enachman@...vell.com, tchornyi@...vell.com, vmytnyk@...vell.com,
vkochan@...vell.com, pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alok.a.tiwarilinux@...il.com, alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: marvell: prestera: fix FEC error message for SFP ports
In prestera_ethtool_set_fecparam(), the error message is opposite of
the condition checking PRESTERA_PORT_TCVR_SFP. FEC configuration is
not allowed on SFP ports, but the message says "non-SFP ports", which
does not match the condition. However, FEC may be required depending on
the transceiver, cable, or mode, and firmware already validates invalid
combinations.
Remove the SFP transceiver check and let firmware handle validation.
Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
---
v1 -> v2
remove condition of if (port->caps.transceiver ==
PRESTERA_PORT_TCVR_SFP) check instead of error message correction
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_ethtool.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_ethtool.c
index 2f52daba58e6..750c72f628e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_ethtool.c
@@ -717,11 +717,6 @@ static int prestera_ethtool_set_fecparam(struct net_device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (port->caps.transceiver == PRESTERA_PORT_TCVR_SFP) {
- netdev_err(dev, "FEC set is not allowed on non-SFP ports\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
fec = PRESTERA_PORT_FEC_MAX;
for (mode = 0; mode < PRESTERA_PORT_FEC_MAX; mode++) {
if ((port_fec_caps[mode].eth_fec & fecparam->fec) &&
--
2.50.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists