[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30f02e83-8cb4-476d-a8a3-b21eb61f4355@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 10:35:42 +0530
From: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Meghana
Malladi" <m-malladi@...com>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, "Vadim
Fedorenko" <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, Himanshu Mittal <h-mittal1@...com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, "Markus
Elfring" <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg: Remove dedicated workqueue
for ndo_set_rx_mode callback
On 05/02/26 11:55 am, Kevin Hao wrote:
> Currently, both the icssg-prueth and icssg-prueth-sr1 drivers create
> a dedicated 'emac->cmd_wq' workqueue.
>
> In the icssg-prueth-sr1 driver, this workqueue is not utilized at all.
>
> In the icssg-prueth driver, the workqueue is only used to execute the
> actual processing of ndo_set_rx_mode. However, creating a dedicated
> workqueue for such a simple use case is unnecessary. To simplify the
> code, switch to using the system default workqueue instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Danish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists