netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: marvell: prestera: fix FEC error message for SFP ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <177043802432.1183264.5861615136442702273.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 04:20:24 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
Cc: enachman@...vell.com, tchornyi@...vell.com, vmytnyk@...vell.com,
 vkochan@...vell.com, pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 alok.a.tiwarilinux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: marvell: prestera: fix FEC error message
 for
 SFP ports

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Thu,  5 Feb 2026 01:19:55 -0800 you wrote:
> In prestera_ethtool_set_fecparam(), the error message is opposite of
> the condition checking PRESTERA_PORT_TCVR_SFP. FEC configuration is
> not allowed on SFP ports, but the message says "non-SFP ports", which
> does not match the condition. However, FEC may be required depending on
> the transceiver, cable, or mode, and firmware already validates invalid
> combinations.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,net-next] net: marvell: prestera: fix FEC error message for SFP ports
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/dddb0198c2a8

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html