netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 4/4] selftests: drv-net: rss_ctx: test RSS contexts persist after ifdown/up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260211085822.184f85c2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 08:58:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Pavan Chebbi <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>, Michael Chan
 <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Andrew Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/4] selftests: drv-net: rss_ctx: test RSS
 contexts persist after ifdown/up

On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:08:39 +0530 Pavan Chebbi wrote:
> > > My experiments are pointing to 'self.cancel()' sometimes taking a lot
> > > of time as part of the exec().
> > > I don't know but I feel the new test code itself should be OK. I can
> > > send a v3 and you can run it once too?  
> >
> > Could you reply to this thread with what the version of the patch where
> > you see defer() takes a long time? We use defer all over the place..  
> 
> Oh it is still in my sandbox. It's after I incorporate the comments I
> received on the v2.
> You should see it in v3. Let me ask Michael to send it.

I'm asking for the version that doesn't work / causes trouble.
Presumably that's not the version you want Michael to submit?