phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] Different cost settings and optional input

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <218AE73F98E99C4C98AF7D5166AA798E09037128@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:06:52 +0000
From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
To: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>, Steve Thomas <steve@...tu.com>,
	"discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] Different cost settings and optional input

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marsh Ray [mailto:maray@...rosoft.com]
> That would imply that N_97 =~ 5.8e6. I.e., 96.7% of users chose one of the
> 5.7 million most common passwords.

No, sorry, that's wong. It would imply 100% of users chose one of the 5.7e6 most common and 96.7% of users chose one that was already in use.

- Marsh