phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] Re: Suggestion: API should include a verifier function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C7343D2F062@uxcn10-tdc02.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 04:36:02 +0000
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] Re: Suggestion: API should include a verifier function

Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@...link.co> writes:

>http://www.security-assessment.com/files/documents/presentations/TimingAttackPresentation2012.pdf

The standalone slides by themselves aren't terribly comprehensible without the
audio commentary, thus my reference to the upcoming writeup.

Peter.