phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <05f9f0061e684b05b5fe4ae136e042d3@BLUPR03MB166.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 06:34:38 +0000
From: Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

From: Tony Arcieri Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:50 PM
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should rewrite my example in Python in a style more similar to the other submissions?

Not my call, whatever others on the list like is fine with me. Just consider the audience, and you can do that as well (or probably better than) I. My understanding was that we were just discussing ideas, not actual submissions (which will need an implementation in C). Maybe pseudocode will work for this. A lot of folks seem to like Python too.

I didn't have much trouble reading Trevor Perrin's Python, but I note that it didn't *actually* seem to be parallelizing over multiple threads. The Ruby looked like it would run in parallel, except that the normal interpreter doesn't do that. Go figure!

- Marsh