phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 23:51:07 -0700
From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] A (naively?) simple PHC submission using hash chains

Maybe it would be easier to just make a diagram ;)

I've removed some of the gnarlier Ruby elements from the code and peppered
it with a few more comments. Is it easier to understand now?

https://gist.github.com/tarcieri/6171003


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Marsh Ray <maray@...rosoft.com> wrote:

> From: Tony Arcieri Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:50 PM
> >
> > Sorry, perhaps I should rewrite my example in Python in a style more
> similar to the other submissions?
>
> Not my call, whatever others on the list like is fine with me. Just
> consider the audience, and you can do that as well (or probably better
> than) I. My understanding was that we were just discussing ideas, not
> actual submissions (which will need an implementation in C). Maybe
> pseudocode will work for this. A lot of folks seem to like Python too.
>
> I didn't have much trouble reading Trevor Perrin's Python, but I note that
> it didn't *actually* seem to be parallelizing over multiple threads. The
> Ruby looked like it would run in parallel, except that the normal
> interpreter doesn't do that. Go figure!
>
> - Marsh
>
>
>


-- 
Tony Arcieri

Content of type "text/html" skipped