phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] The EARWORM password hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C734471C7AE@uxcn10-6.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:52:10 +0000
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] The EARWORM password hash

Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt> writes:

>Since we don't know what area/latency/throughput tradeoffs Intel/AMD/future
>ARM licensees made when implementing AES-NI, it is possible that an FPGA/ASIC
>attacker could have a significant advantage over the defender. Depending on
>the scheme, bitsliced GPU AES could also perhaps be competitive.

Wait until Bitcoin II, using AES, comes out, and the AES brute-force ASICs
start to appear as they already have for SHA256...

Peter.