lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:41:23 +0100
From: Christian Forler <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Proposed timeline changes

On 05.01.2014 03:19, Solar Designer wrote:
> So, yes, at least escrypt and Catena teams would like a chance to submit
> revised and/or different versions (beyond mere "tweaks"), where
> influence by other submissions (which we can't possibly see all of
> before the round 1 submission deadline, whatever it is) might play a
> major role.  For example, I might like some aspects of new Catena so
> much that I'd want them in a major revision of escrypt (beyond tweaks),
> yet not like the new Catena as much as to choose it over escrypt almost
> as-is (with mere tweaks to Catena).

I just revised the eprint paper. Happy reading :-)

Furthermore, I just created a new github repo for the Catena reference
implementation (

We appreciate any optimized implementation of Catena, or any other kind
of constructive contribution. Volunteers are welcome. :-)

Best regards,

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (552 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists