phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] A silly (?) consideration for script-friendly hashes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrU_h0R2VffHtrrCoH8a6C90_e1Xvi7k=R24yQL6WogDPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:30:41 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: discussions <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] A silly (?) consideration for script-friendly hashes

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Tony Arcieri <bascule@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> If people are planning on having client-side offload, or, more
>> generally, if whatever hash wins ends up with a highly optimized
>> implementation in web browsers, there may be a problem: anyone who can
>> get people to leave their browsers pointed at pictures of kittens that
>> compute hashes in the background effectively has a big network of
>> password hashers.
>
>
> They can already do that, FYI

True, but they don't benefit from a fancy non-JavaScript implementation.

Admittedly, this is becoming less and less important as time goes on,
especially in the face of things like PNaCl.

--Andy