lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <003d01cf1a1b$e1e2a580$a5a7f080$@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:22:07 -0500
From: "Gary W. Hvizdak" <gary.hvizdak@....rr.com>
To: <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] Initial (non-proof-read) NeolKDF paper

Not one to give up ... re-resending ...

Resending reformatted for readability ...

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary W. Hvizdak [mailto:gary.hvizdak@....rr.com] 
Sent: Saturday 25 Jan 2014 1718
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: RE: [PHC] Initial (non-proof-read) NeolKDF paper

Bill Cox wrote ...

If you would like to see the earliest version and maybe provide some
constructive feedback, please feel free to take a look.  It's at:

https://github.com/waywardgeek/noelkdf/blob/master/NoelKDF.odt

--

Bill,

    In 2.1 Simplified NoelKDF, the statement ...

    value = value*(mem[prevAddr++] | 3) + mem[randAddr++];

... is equivalent to ...

  switch ( mem[prevAddr++] | 3 )
  {
    case 0 : value = mem[randAddr++];                         break;
    case 1 : value = mem[randAddr++] + value;                 break;
    case 2 : value = mem[randAddr++] +         (value << 1);  break;
    case 3 : value = mem[randAddr++] + value + (value << 1);  break;
    default :
  }

... which is surely the route an attacker would take.

Cheers,
Gary


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ