lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:09:10 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PHC] Opinions sought on whether a specific side-channel leakage is ok.

Peter Maxwell (at Monday, January 27, 2014, 7:37:24 PM):

> I suspect I may have a few ideas on how to do this efficiently

i'm very curious about that.

> ​Do we standardize parameters for other submissions?​

other submissions have parameters like four integers or so. having an
8000 word dictionary as part of the definition is an entirely
different animal. but if you can do without, this complaint does not

Powered by blists - more mailing lists