phc-discussions - Re: Fwd: [PHC] Opinions sought on whether a specific side-channel leakage is ok.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1981826128.20140127200910@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:09:10 +0100
From: Krisztián Pintér <pinterkr@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: Fwd: [PHC] Opinions sought on whether a specific side-channel leakage is ok.

Peter Maxwell (at Monday, January 27, 2014, 7:37:24 PM):

> I suspect I may have a few ideas on how to do this efficiently

i'm very curious about that.

> Do we standardize parameters for other submissions?

other submissions have parameters like four integers or so. having an
8000 word dictionary as part of the definition is an entirely
different animal. but if you can do without, this complaint does not
apply.