lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:33:43 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] An argument for Catena-2

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 03:32:04PM -0500, Bill Cox wrote:
> I benchmarked Catena-2, and it is running 3.4X faster than Scrypt,
> compared to 2.6X faster for Catena-3.

Why are Catena-2 and -3 faster than scrypt, in your benchmarks?

This sounds wrong to me.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists